Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡°ú¿ë ½ºÄ³³Ê Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±¹Á¦Ç¥Áظðµ¨ÀÇ Àç·á ¹× Ç¥¸é »óÅ¿¡ µû¸¥½ºÄµ ¿µ»ó °á°ú¹° ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

Comparative study on quality of scanned images from varying materials and surface conditions of standardized model for dental scanner evaluation

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2018³â 34±Ç 2È£ p.104 ~ 115
¹ÚÁÖÈñ, ¼³Á¤È¯, ÀÌÁØÀç, À̽ÂÇ¥, ÀÓ¿µÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁÖÈñ ( Park Ju-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¼³Á¤È¯ ( Seol Jeong-Hwan ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÁØÀç ( Lee Jun-Jae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
À̽ÂÇ¥ ( Lee Seung-Pyo ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø ±¸°­ÇغÎÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ¿µÁØ ( Lim Young-Jun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÇöÀç ½ÃÆǵǰí ÀÖ´Â ±¸°­½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¸°­½ºÄ³³Ê Á¤È®µµ Æò°¡¸¦ À§ÇØ ±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØÀÌ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ°í Àִ¸ðÇüÀÇ ½ºÄµÀ̹ÌÁö ȹµæÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ Áö ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í, À̸¦ ÅëÇØ Ç¥Áظðµ¨ÀÌ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆľÇÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ISO12836°ú ANSI/ADA no.132¿¡¼­ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ±¹Á¦Ç¥ÁØÀ» Âü°íÇÏ¿© 3D ÇÁ¸°Åͱ⸦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ðµ¨À» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¸ðµ¨½ºÄ³³Ê¿Í µÎ °¡Áö ±¸°­½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ºÄµÀ» ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ºÄµÀ̹ÌÁö ȹµæ Á¤µµ¸¦ 3µî±ÞÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ½ºÄ³³ÊÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¸ðµ¨ Ç¥¸éÀÇ »óÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ À̹ÌÁö ȹµæ ´É·Âµµ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ¸ðµ¨ ½ºÄ³³Ê°¡ ¸ðµç ¸ðµ¨¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç TRIOS3´Â µÕ±Ù ÇüÅÂÀÇ ±¸Á¶¹°, CS3500Àº°¢Áø ÇüÅÂÀÇ ±¸Á¶¹°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À̹ÌÁö ÀçÇöÀÌ ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. Ç¥ÁØ ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ Ç¥¸é»óÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ½ºÄµÀ̹ÌÁö ÀçÇö¿¡¼­´Â ÃÊ°æ¼®°í ¸ðµ¨ÀÌ ½ºÄ³³Ê Á¾·ù¿Í °ü°è¾øÀÌ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3D ÇÁ¸°Æà ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ °æ¿ì, Ç¥¸é¿¡ ÆÄ¿ì´õ 󸮸¦ ÇÑ ¸ðµ¨¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ ½ºÄµÀ̹ÌÁö¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ISO12836°ú ANSI/ADA 132ÀÇ Ç¥Áظðµ¨ÀÇ °æ¿ì, ±¸°­½ºÄ³³ÊÀÇ field of view (FOV)¸¦ ¹þ¾î³ª´Â ±¸Á¶¹°À» ½ºÄµÇÒ ¶§ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¸éÀÎ °ÍÀ» ±¸ºÐÇÏ´Â ±âÁØÁ¡ÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Ô µÇ¸é ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ ½ºÄµ ¹× Á¤ÇÕ°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Á¤È®ÇÑ À̹ÌÁö¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¸øÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ´Ü¼øÇÑ ÆÐÅÏÀÇ ¹Ýº¹°ú ´ëĪ±¸Á¶¸¦ °¡ÁöÁö ¾Ê´Â »õ·Î¿î Ç¥Áظðµ¨ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ¿©°ÜÁø´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the image acquisition ability of intraoral scanners by analyzing the comprehensiveness of scanned images from standardized model, and to identify problems of the model. Materials and
Methods: Cast models and 3D-printed models were prepared according to international standards set by ISO12836 and ANSI/ADA no. 132, which were then scanned by model scanner and two different intraoral scanners (TRIOS3 and CS3500). The image acquisition performance of the scanners was classified into three grades, and the study was repeated with varying surface conditions of the models.

Results: Model scanner produced the most accurate images in all models. Meanwhile, CS3500 showed good image reproducibility for angled structures and TRIOS3 showed good image reproducibility for rounded structures. As for model ingredients, improved plaster model best reproduced scan images regardless of the type of scanner used. When limited to 3D-printed model, powdered surface condition resulted in higher image quality.

Conclusion: When scanning structures beyond FOV (field of view) in standardized models (following ISO12836 and ANSI/ADA 132), lack of reference points to help distinguish different faces confuses the scanning and matching process, resulting in inaccurate display of images. These results imply the need to develop a new standard model not confined to simple pattern repetition and symmetric structure.

Å°¿öµå

±¹Á¦Ç¥Áظðµ¨; ±¸°­½ºÄ³³Ê; ¸ðµ¨½ºÄ³³Ê; Á¤È®µµ; µðÁöÅÐ Àλó
international standard model; intraoral scanner; model scanner; accuracy; digital impression

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI